Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Status No Status
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 25, 2022

PI Square - Nested threads look "cramped" and difficult to read

It is difficult to read threads deep in hierarchy. This thread is an example. https://pisquare.osisoft.com/s/question/0D51I00004aqRI8SAM/ramping-calculation-in-af-based-on-future-tag
  • Attach files
  • Kenneth Barber
    Reply
    |
    Aug 25, 2022
    To address the issue, the comments should use more of the horizontal space on the page. For blog posts, this means making the blog pane collapsible or putting the blog pane elsewhere, probably at the bottom of the page. It would also help if the reply to the 1st comment in the example link wasn't indented so much. There should also be a minimum width for each comment so that if indentation would violate the minimum width, then indentation does not occur. I say "minimum width" and not "maximum indentation level" to account for different screen sizes.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 25, 2022
    Another example: https://pisquare.osisoft.com/s/question/0D51I00004UHkH1SAL/building-the-pi-tag-data-reference-configstring-dynamically?t=1610047552989 Used to look good on the old platform. Looks terrible now. Difficult to read is an understatement. Almost impossible to read is more appropriate.