Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Status No Status
Categories Event Frames (EF)
Created by jtepfer@ebay.com
Created on Aug 20, 2022

Custom Severity Levels for Event Frames (EF) Triggers

Enable the ability for end-user to manage custom severity levels for event frames, to allow for better communications across response teams and business unit functions. Exposing EF severity levels within a PI Notifications messages is very helpful in providing quick context to an issue. However, it can create confusion when those severity levels do not map well to a specific company's internal standard for incident reporting in either the severity level namings or qty of severity levels. EXAMPLE MAPPING PROBLEM: Event Frame = None, Information, Warning, Minor, Major, Critical Cust 1 = Normal, SEV5, SEV4, SEV3, SEV2, SEV1 Cust 2 = Good, Information, Warning, Major, Critical, Fatal Cust 3 = Clear, Indeterminate, Warning, Error, Fatal Cust 4 = Normal, Low, Medium. High, Critical In many of the above cases a Customer would be challenged in sending the EF severity level in a notification given with their internal mapping is either in conflict or has no context. Below is my specific mapping issue/challenge. EF Level to Cust Level Mapping: Critical = Fatal Major = Critical Minor = Major Warning = Warning Information = Data Issue None = Normal
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 3, 2022

    good idea

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 20, 2022
    This is a very important feature add to our business.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 20, 2022
    My use case for this would be to map event severity to another system that is generating events so the users see the same "severity" level for events in both systems. The other system has been operating long before we had PI, and now that we're exposing those events in PIVision the users want to see that the severity of the event matches the system generating the event.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 20, 2022
    Any updates on this feature request?