AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status No status
Product AVEVA™ PI Server
Categories Asset Framework (AF)
Created by Asle Frantzen
Created on Aug 19, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Rename the PIFD database to PIAssetFrameworkDb

Nobody knows what PIFD means. We've had customer personell create PIDF2, PIFD3, etc. when tasked to create new AF databases, and also requests to remove PIFD because ICT personell don't know what it is. I suggest renaming the SQL Server database for AF to something more understandable. Following the naming structure used f.ex. by the PI Integrators, the name could be PIAssetFrameworkDb, or simply PIAFDB
  • Attach files
      Drop here to upload
    • Guest
      Reply
      |       Aug 19, 2022
      As you know, users are able to change the database name if they choose to, i.e. from PIFD to whatever they want after installation. Is this request to change the default name with the initial installation?
    • Asle Frantzen
      Reply
      |       Aug 19, 2022
      Yes, I think a clear and meaningful name of the database will benefit "everyone". I understand it's under the hood, to some extent, but keeping working titles and code names 10-15 years after a product launch isn't really necessary. And looking at the naming convention for databases in newer products, such as the PiIntegratorDb, it certainly makes it easier to deal with. Renaming a database for an important product such as PI AF isn't really for the faint hearted, I'm not sure if there's a KB article for it or not, but it's not really something people want to mess around with. Much better if OSIsoft introduces the change.
    • Kenneth Barber
      Reply
      |       Aug 19, 2022
      The name "PIAssetFrameworkDb" or "PIAFDB" could introduce some confusion between PI Asset Framework databases (the kind that is viewable in PI System Explorer) and the PI Asset Framework's underlying SQL Server database. However, I feel that it is still a better name than "PIFD". You get my vote.