Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Status No Status
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 20, 2022

Filter/Flag PI System Generated Error Message as Analysis Inputs to prevent False Positive Evaluations

The PI data archive (and potentially other systems) can generate many automated error messages to assist with troubleshooting. One such key example is "[-10767] Client exceeded maximum concurrent queries in RPC thread pool", which occurs when a service (such as AF Analyses) doesn't have adequate threads to retrieve input values. If this error is given because of a system issue, the Asset Analysis service will still process the logic with that error message being used a generic string. If the logic is something similar to Input <>1, then this would resolve as TRUE. In this scenario, this would be a false positive result for the customer. Because these error messages come from the Data Archive, this scenario could affect a customer's entire set of analyses. Can we include functionality to flag, filter, or reject input variables that are PI system generated error messages? This doesn't resolve the issue of data quality, but it cuts down on inaccuracy coming from the central system itself.
  • Attach files