AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status No Status
Product AVEVA™ PI Server
Categories Analytics & Calculations
Created by Gael
Created on Aug 20, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Permanent disable of non used AF Analysis

It would be interesting to be able to permanently disable an AF analysis if this one is not used within the template. This could be a scheduling option: Permanently Disable The status of the analysis would indicate that this analysis is permanently disable and this is "normal". There are many cases that this feature will be used to avoid creating multiple templates.
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 20, 2022
    Please help me understand why you wouldn't just remove this analysis if it's permanently disabled in the template?
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 20, 2022
    Hello Stephen, if you define an Analysis at the Template level but don't want to run it for an element based on that template, your only option is to Stop it, but it is still shown in the list. There is a risk that someone could start it thinking it was stopped by mistake. If you had the option to Disable the Analysis, it would be a clear indicator that the Analysis is not apply to the element.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 20, 2022
    Currently in PI System Explorer, we use "Enable" and "Disable" already for an analysis. I think what you're describing is a different state that differentiates it from the currently available states. Am I understanding your request correctly?