AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Declined
Product AVEVA™ PI Server
Categories Analytics & Calculations
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 20, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Analysis Brace matching and putting comments

Customer would like to have Brace/Parenthesis matching and adding comments (e.g. //) functions in Analysis Expression like programming languages.
  • ADMIN RESPONSE
    Aug 20, 2022
    As already noted, inline comments are currently supported. Separate comments as a "variable" is also supported. In terms of the matching braces/brackets, we have no plans to implement that as Asset Analytics and PI System Explorer are not meant to be a full development environment like Visual Studio and turning it into a full development environment is too heavy weight.
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 20, 2022
    Brace matching would probably be nice. Comments are already supported - C style single and multiline comments are both available (though probably poorly documented).
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 20, 2022
    I would prefer to have separate comment entries, not only inline comments. When I move a variable to another position I do not want the comment to be moved automatically as well.
  • rphilp1
    Reply
    |     Aug 20, 2022
    In response to Holger Joist, "I would prefer to have separate comment ..." Have you considered adding  a "variable" at the top of the analysis that is nothing but comments?