We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.
To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.
This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.
I agree I'm not understanding why this would not easily be added.
I have read from different users that indeed the annotations are essential to further track data in BI solutions.
Me and my colleagues are working on downtime tracking, QEHS events, ... that are being tracked and where operators and proces engineers are actively adding comments to the events. We need to use workarounds to get this data available.
It would make it alot easier for us to just be able to send the data via a supported PI technologie like DAS of PI integrator for BI
I used comments - > annotations in PIOLEDB Enterprise in a solution that we are trying move into RTQP and this is a roadblock. We have to have our event frame comments available in Power BI to implement full features. The loss in functionality is not good as we are recommended to use RTQP as a more efficient tool.
The IsAnnotated field available PI SQL Client is often useless because it is set to True as soon as a notification is sent based on the event frame.
To answer questions such as "how many event frames were annotated by actual human users ?", we need to access the details of annotations.
This function is necessary because PI sql client is an official recommended tool