AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status No Status
Product PI Interfaces
Categories Batch Interfaces
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 17, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Allow Tag Template Triggers to trigger on blank placeholders

Currently, Batch Interface Framework interfaces implement tag template triggers that can trigger whenever a placeholder has any value. These interfaces should also support triggering when a placeholder does not have a value. For example, our SISBatch data source has separate columns for Operation and Phase information. We would like to record the value of the [DESCRIPT] column in a tag only for non-phase batch events (i.e. trigger the tag template only when the [PHASE] placeholder is blank).
  • Attach files
  • Monica Rattaggi GSK
    Reply
    |     Mar 25, 2024

    We upgraded the EMDVB interface to version 5.1, but unfortunately the features is not available.

    We are forced to use an old version 3.x to collect records where the UNIT is not selected.


  • Tim Proeber
    Reply
    |     Mar 5, 2024

    Sometimes a [UNIT] is not selected, and we want to detect this in a Tag Template.

  • Monica Rattaggi GSK
    Reply
    |     Dec 27, 2022

    This feature was available in version 3.x of EMDVB (Emerson DeltaV Batch Interface)

    The lack of this capability in version 4.x is a serious backwards compatibility issue.

    We hope a new release will be available in a short time.


  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 17, 2022
    The capability to interpret blank fields would be very beneficial. The addition of reading S88 batch levels 1-6 [Level] would also be useful.