AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Declined
Product AVEVA™ RtReports
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 16, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Conditionally set the Report Approval Cycle

As an RtReports administrator, I would like to set my reports to only require the review cycle to be completed if the batch data is flagged as questionable. Otherwise, no manual review should be required.
  • ADMIN RESPONSE
    Aug 16, 2022
    We are declining this item as we don't feel it's the right fit with our overall RtReports product strategy. Thank you for your feedback, and please continue sharing your thoughts on how we can better serve you.
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 16, 2022
    This suggestion is similar to 2 others submitted and upvoted earlier this year: all of these requests can be summarized as asking for more flexible, conditional review process which can be programatically queried or controlled. https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555154-rtreports/suggestions/17964184-conditional-approval https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555154-rtreports/suggestions/20009893-allow-access-to-rtreports-review-data-programmatic I understand that rethinking the reviewing process will require considerable effort, but is this a feature that can be considered for 4.1? The demand obviously exists, but it's nowhere to be found on the current RtReports roadmap.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 16, 2022
    This suggestion is similar to 2 others submitted and upvoted earlier this year: all of these requests can be summarized as asking for more flexible, conditional review process which can be programatically queried or controlled. https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555154-rtreports/suggestions/17964184-conditional-approval https://feedback.osisoft.com/forums/555154-rtreports/suggestions/20009893-allow-access-to-rtreports-review-data-programmatic I understand that rethinking the reviewing process will require considerable effort, but is this a feature that can be considered for 4.1? The demand obviously exists, but it's nowhere to be found on the current RtReports roadmap.