Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Status No Status
Categories Symbols
Created by Jason Gogal
Created on Aug 18, 2022

Asset Comparison Table: Label options for attribute columns

The asset comparison table should allow control of what is shown as the column name. It would be helpful to be able to add custom friendly names to columns in asset comparison tables, or to use attribute description.
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 18, 2022
    Asset Comparison table, Ability to change column names would be usefull
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 18, 2022
    Being able to use an attribute's description as the column header would be good.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 18, 2022
    The asset comparison table is very limited in customization. Currently there is no way to modify the column name, header height, text font, etc.
  • Rory_EPE
    Reply
    |
    Aug 18, 2022
    It's difficult to use asset comparison tables with long attribute names (especially when using child attributes)
  • zwhite
    Reply
    |
    Aug 18, 2022
    There is a work around to this, that can be annoying / cumbersome. However here it goes. Requirements: PI Vision 2021 This will require a calculation, name the calculaiton the new column name you want. In the asset field drop in the relevent asset. the calculation for me is as follows > if BadVal('asset attribute') then "No Data" // you can leave this out if you don't mind displaying bad status to user > else 'asset attribute' Add this calculation to the comparison table and voila. This a bit janky but is a work around in the mean time.