AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status No Status
Product AVEVA™ PI Vision™
Categories Look & Feel / Styling
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 19, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Allow DateTime columns to be sorted in chronological order

Currently in the Table and Asset Comparison Table symbol, data in columns can be sorted in numerical or alphabetical order. For columns with timestamp format (e.g. DD/MM/YYYY), allow sorting of time stamps by the DateTime properly.
  • Attach files
  • John Swartzentruber
    Reply
    |     Aug 19, 2022
    This seems more like a bug than a feature enhancement. Have you contacted support about this issue?
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 19, 2022
    Small correction to this enhancement request. Sorting also doesn't work even for English US timestamps. John, yes I've discussed this with our PI Vision team. Since this feature is not supported, we decided that this is more suitable for enhancement request.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 19, 2022
    The Asset Comparison table is currently just performing an alpha numeric sort as mentioned in our documentation so it actually doesn't work for all attribute values storing timestamps regardless of locale. https://livelibrary.osisoft.com/LiveLibrary/content/en/vision-v3/GUID-4A3A22B4-72E4-4772-BE25-11F2FBA65B0E Since this is just really a numeric sort in this case it may appear as though attributes storing En-US timestamps are correct but that is just because in En-US months are represented first and there are not many multi-digit months. When sorting between days of the same month though this can still be mishandled as it sorts each digit individually so 17 can be sorted above 3 for example. We would need some additional handling to account for sorting of timestamps so I though it would be best to add that as an enhancement request.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 19, 2022
    Any feedback on if this is possible or if this is being progressed. I'm getting complaints every month change that the pi screens have stopped working due to this issue.