Skip to Main Content
AVEVA™ PI System™ Feedback Portal

Welcome to our new feedback site!


We created this site to hear your enhancement ideas, suggestions and feedback about AVEVA products and services. All of the feedback you share here is monitored and reviewed by the AVEVA product managers.

To start, take a look at the ideas in the list below and VOTE for your favorite ideas submitted by other users. POST your own idea if it hasn’t been suggested yet. Include COMMENTS and share relevant business case details that will help our product team get more information on the suggestion. Please note that your ideas and comments are visible to all other users.


This page is for feedback specifically for AVEVA PI System. For links to our other feedback portals, please see the tab RESOURCES below.

Status Declined
Categories Data Archive
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 20, 2022

Allow bi-temporal data archiving

PI DA Server should allow for more flexibility in terms of the format of archived data. A big advantage would be if PI could archive two timestamps per event. One timestamp will come from whatever the data source is (PI Interfaces, fiels devices, etc) - this is effectively what PI has now. In addition to that, PI Should be able to add a second timestamp recording when the event got into PI i.e. when either PI Snapshot or Archive Subsystem saw the event coming in their respective queue. Benefits and use cases: - any PI Client could make sure it gets all new pi events since client last talked to PI. Keep in mind that PI can have lots of backfills going on at the same time as realtime data so it is impossible for a PI Client app to know that since last time it talked to PI, there was a backfill correcting some data for 3 months ago. I know there are consumer queues, but they are not working properly all the time, they can overflow, etc. The more robust way would be if PI knew when it actually got the events. - PI admins would easily detect backfill operations and asses data latency and anomalous delays. Questions like : when do we get most data into our PI during the day, or when did these duplicate events made into PI, or what is the data latency from field sensors to the PI archive, would all easily be answered. Now it's virtually impossible. Please upvote if you like.
  • ADMIN RESPONSE
    Aug 20, 2022
    Thank you very much for sharing your feedback on the PI Server. After further evaluation, we have decided to decline this item, as we are not planning on implementing it in the near future due to other high priority items across the PI System. Thank you for your feedback, and know that we are listening and reviewing every item that gets submitted!
  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 20, 2022
    To add to the initial ideas, I believe data analyses would also benefit from knowing when the events were archived. Better overall updates management as well, better analyses reprocessing triggers. For example, one would know which backfilled events caused a calculation to re-evaluate its result and have a better picture of the data overall.
  • jdjohnstn
    Reply
    |
    Aug 20, 2022
    Other use cases for bi-temporal data include - delayed data entry (lab analysis of physical sample sent to PI hours after the sample was bottled) - data correction (data entered in real time from DCS, but later corrected by engineer after recalibrating instrument)